Cornell v. First Nat. Bank of Miami

163 So. 482, 121 Fla. 192, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1541
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 11, 1935·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The writ of error brings for review a judgment in favor of the defendant in a suit for damage for personal injuries resulting from the alleged negligence of the defendant.

*193 The record shows that if the defendant was' guilty of any negligence at all the plaintiff materially contributed to the cause of the injury by his own negligence and was, therefore, barred from recovery.

The judgment is affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cornell v. First Nat. Bank of Miami, 163 So. 482, 121 Fla. 192, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1541 (Fla. 1935).

163 So. 482 (Cornell v. First Nat. Bank of Miami) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McMullin v. Palmer
40 F.R.D. 368 (N.D. Mississippi, 1966)
Humphries v. Boersma
190 F.2d 843 (Fifth Circuit, 1951)
Stanford v. Atlantic Life Ins.
109 F.2d 428 (Fifth Circuit, 1940)