Cornell v. Dean

105 Mass. 435
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 15, 1870·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Chapman, C. J.

Persons acquainted with the business of pasturing cattle may testify as to the price or value of pasturing, and as to its being worth more to pasture them transiently than by the season. This is a species of evidence that is applied to a great variety of transactions. Carpenter v. Wait, 11 Cush. 257. Shattuck v. Stoneham Branch Railroad Co. 6 Allen, 115. Commonwealth v. Dorsey, 103 Mass. 412. The evidence on this point was properly admitted.

Hall and the Slades were not parties to the contract between the parties to this action. They were the plaintiff’s lessors, and their rent was to be one half of the proceeds of the land, for which their claim was upon him after he should have collected the amount. The contract was unlike that in Delaney v. Root, 99 Mass. 546. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cornell v. Dean, 105 Mass. 435 (Mass. 1870).

105 Mass. 435 (Cornell v. Dean) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Orcutt v. Moore
134 Mass. 48 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1883)
Walker v. Curtis
116 Mass. 98 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1874)
Warner v. Abbey
112 Mass. 355 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1873)
Miller v. Smith
112 Mass. 470 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1873)