Cornell v. Cornell
This text of 166 N.E.2d 502 (Cornell v. Cornell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: There was argued an alleged constitutional question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Whether the Supreme Court of the State of New York has the power to grant a final judgment of divorce nunc pro tunc under the circumstances set forth in this record without violating the prohibitions contained in section 10 of article I and in section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The Court of Appeals held there was no such violation and that no substantial constitutional question was presented. [See 7 N Y 2d 164.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
166 N.E.2d 502, 7 N.Y.2d 987, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cornell-v-cornell-ny-1960.