Cornell v. Acme Road Machinery Co.
238 A.D. 767
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1933
StatusPublished
This text of 238 A.D. 767 (Cornell v. Acme Road Machinery Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cornell v. Acme Road Machinery Co., 238 A.D. 767 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Sears, P. J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law on the ground that the reception in evidence of the letter, Exhibit 4, and the testimony of the witness Wright, in view of the sharply contested questions of fact, constituted reversible error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
238 A.D. 767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cornell-v-acme-road-machinery-co-nyappdiv-1933.