Cornell v. Abrams
This text of 167 A.D. 939 (Cornell v. Abrams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the grounds that it was error on the part of the trial court to direct a verdict under the circumstances of this ease, and that the alleged special verdict [940]*940on the submitted questions was against the weight of evidence. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
167 A.D. 939, 152 N.Y.S. 1105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cornell-v-abrams-nyappdiv-1915.