Cornell Joel Grossman, D.D.S. v. United States Atomic Energy Commission and United States of America

D.C. Circuit

Cornell Joel Grossman, D.D.S. v. United States Atomic Energy Commission and United States of America

289 F.2d 464, 110 U.S. App. D.C. 87, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4841

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided April 13, 1961·No. 16080_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The questions involved in this case are practically identical with those we decided in Grossman v. United States, United States Atomic Energy Commission, 101 U.S.App.D.C. 22, 246 F.2d 709, appeal dismissed, 355 U.S. 285, 78 S.Ct. 340, 2 L.Ed.2d 270, rehearing denied, 355 U. S. 942, 78 S.Ct. 427, 2 L.Ed.2d 422. The principle of res judicata requires affirmance of the order now before us.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The questions involved in this case are practically identical with those we decided in Grossman v. United States, United States Atomic Energy Commission, 101 U.S.App.D.C. 22, 246 F.2d 709, appeal dismissed, 355 U.S. 285, 78 S.Ct. 340, 2 L.Ed.2d 270, rehearing denied, 355 U. S. 942, 78 S.Ct. 427, 2 L.Ed.2d 422. The principle of res judicata requires affirmance of the order now before us.

Affirmed.

Cornell Joel Grossman, D.D.S. v. United States Atomic Energy Commission and United States of America, 289 F.2d 464, 110 U.S. App. D.C. 87, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4841 (D.C. Cir. 1961).

Pincite

289 F.2d 464 (Cornell Joel Grossman, D.D.S. v. United States Atomic Energy Commission and United States of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related