Cornell Joel Grossman, D.D.S. v. United States Atomic Energy Commission and United States of America
This text of 289 F.2d 464 (Cornell Joel Grossman, D.D.S. v. United States Atomic Energy Commission and United States of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The questions involved in this case are practically identical with those we decided in Grossman v. United States, United States Atomic Energy Commission, 101 U.S.App.D.C. 22, 246 F.2d 709, appeal dismissed, 355 U.S. 285, 78 S.Ct. 340, 2 L.Ed.2d 270, rehearing denied, 355 U. S. 942, 78 S.Ct. 427, 2 L.Ed.2d 422. The principle of res judicata requires affirmance of the order now before us.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
289 F.2d 464, 110 U.S. App. D.C. 87, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cornell-joel-grossman-dds-v-united-states-atomic-energy-commission-and-cadc-1961.