Cornell I. Hussey Willie James Hussey v. William F. Simpson, Jr.

Fourth Circuit

Cornell I. Hussey Willie James Hussey v. William F. Simpson, Jr.

72 F.3d 127, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39558, 1995 WL 753064

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedDecember 20, 1995

Docket95-2745

StatusPublished

This text of 72 F.3d 127 (Cornell I. Hussey Willie James Hussey v. William F. Simpson, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cornell I. Hussey Willie James Hussey v. William F. Simpson, Jr., 72 F.3d 127, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39558, 1995 WL 753064 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

72 F.3d 127
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Cornell I. HUSSEY; Willie James Hussey, Plaintiffs--Appellants,
v.
William F. SIMPSON, Jr., Defendant--Appellee.

No. 95-2745.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 28, 1995.
Decided Dec. 20, 1995.

Cornell I. Hussey, Willie James Hussey, Appellants Pro Se. William F. Simpson, Jr., Appellee.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the district court's order dismissing the underlying foreclosure action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1332 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, although we deny the Appellee's motion to dismiss the appeal, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hussey v. Simpson, No. CA-95-70-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 5, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

72 F.3d 127
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Cornell I. HUSSEY; Willie James Hussey, Plaintiffs--Appellants,
v.
William F. SIMPSON, Jr., Defendant--Appellee.

No. 95-2745.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 28, 1995.
Decided Dec. 20, 1995.

Cornell I. Hussey, Willie James Hussey, Appellants Pro Se. William F. Simpson, Jr., Appellee.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the district court's order dismissing the underlying foreclosure action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1332 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, although we deny the Appellee's motion to dismiss the appeal, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hussey v. Simpson, No. CA-95-70-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 5, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 F.3d 127, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39558, 1995 WL 753064, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cornell-i-hussey-willie-james-hussey-v-william-f-s-ca4-1995.