Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish v. Kappos
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
CORNELL D.M. JUDGE CORNISH, P.laintiff-Appellant,
V.
DAVID J. KAPPOS, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNI'I`ED STATES PAT- ENT AND TRADEM_ARK OFFICE, UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, HARRY I. MOATZ, DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND DISCIPLINE, AND W'ILLIAM J. GRIFFIN, STAFF ATTORNEY, OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT ANB DISCIPLINE, Defendants-Appellees.
2012-1157
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in case no. 07-CV-1719, Judge Rich- ard W. Roberts.
ON MOTION
ORDER
CORNISH V. KAPPOS 2
Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish moves to file a response to Appellees’ filing of April 12, 2012.
On April 12, 2012, Appellees filed an unopposed mo- tion for an enlargement of time to file their brief. Cornish acknowledges in the present motion that he agreed to the enlargement The court granted the enlargement of time on April 13, 2012.
To the extent Cornish is arguing the merits of his case, those arguments belong in his brief.
Accordingly, IT Is ORDERED THAT:
The motion is denied.
Fon THE CoURT
HAY 1 7 2012
/s/ J an Horbaly Date J an Horbaly
Clerk
ccc Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish F|LEQ
Raymond T. Chen, Esq. 03 523 NAY l 7 '[Ulz JAN HUHBALY
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish v. Kappos (Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish v. Kappos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.