Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish v. Kappos

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided May 17, 2012·No. 2012-1157·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

CORNELL D.M. JUDGE CORNISH, P.laintiff-Appellant,

V.

DAVID J. KAPPOS, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNI'I`ED STATES PAT- ENT AND TRADEM_ARK OFFICE, UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, HARRY I. MOATZ, DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND DISCIPLINE, AND W'ILLIAM J. GRIFFIN, STAFF ATTORNEY, OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT ANB DISCIPLINE, Defendants-Appellees.

2012-1157

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in case no. 07-CV-1719, Judge Rich- ard W. Roberts.

ON MOTION

ORDER

CORNISH V. KAPPOS 2

Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish moves to file a response to Appellees’ filing of April 12, 2012.

On April 12, 2012, Appellees filed an unopposed mo- tion for an enlargement of time to file their brief. Cornish acknowledges in the present motion that he agreed to the enlargement The court granted the enlargement of time on April 13, 2012.

To the extent Cornish is arguing the merits of his case, those arguments belong in his brief.

Accordingly, IT Is ORDERED THAT:

The motion is denied.

Fon THE CoURT

HAY 1 7 2012

/s/ J an Horbaly Date J an Horbaly

Clerk

ccc Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish F|LEQ

Raymond T. Chen, Esq. 03 523 NAY l 7 '[Ulz JAN HUHBALY

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish v. Kappos, (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish v. Kappos (Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish v. Kappos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.