Cornelius v. Thompson

27 Tex. 31
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1863
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 27 Tex. 31 (Cornelius v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cornelius v. Thompson, 27 Tex. 31 (Tex. 1863).

Opinion

Bell, J.

There is filed with the record, by the defendants in error, a remittitur of the sum of twenty-two dollars and eighty-five cents, and the interest thereon from the time of'the rendition [32]*32of the judgment in the case of Griffis against Brown & Thompson, to the time of the rendition of the judgment in the present case. The clerk of this court will ascertain the amount of the interest on the sum of twenty-two dollars and eighty-five cents, and enter judgment for the amount recovered below, less the amount remitted in conformity with the remittitur on file.

There is no other error in the judgment of the court below than the excess; but the judgment must be reformed at the costs of the defendants in error.

Judgment reformed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jerome v. . Shaw
90 S.E. 764 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1916)
Pye v. Cardwell
224 S.W. 542 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1915)
Holloway Seed Co. v. City National Bank
47 S.W. 95 (Texas Supreme Court, 1898)
G. H. Pearce & Co. v. Tootle, Hosea & Co.
12 S.W. 536 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1889)
Fry v. Longstreet & Sedgwick
1 White & W. 24 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1877)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 Tex. 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cornelius-v-thompson-tex-1863.