Cornelius v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Cornelius v. State

181 So. 127, 28 Ala. App. 176

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 8, 1938

Docket8 Div. 652.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 181 So. 127 (Cornelius v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cornelius v. State, 181 So. 127, 28 Ala. App. 176 (Ala. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of murder in the second degree. We are not sure but that she was guilty as charged (and convicted) even under her own testimony.

But, however that may be, it is clearly a fact that the testimony amply warranted the verdict returned.

There is really nothing apparent worthy of discussion. The few exceptions reserved on the taking of testimony are obviously without merit.

*177 The written charges requested by, and refused to, appellant, if not plainly defective in some essential way, were fully covered in substance by the trial court’s able and elaborate oral charge, or by some one of the written charges given at appellant’s request.

The record appears regular in every re-, spect, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI