Cornelius v. Partain

39 Ala. 473
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 15, 1864
StatusPublished

This text of 39 Ala. 473 (Cornelius v. Partain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cornelius v. Partain, 39 Ala. 473 (Ala. 1864).

Opinion

A. J. WALKER, C. J.

The depositions of two witnesses were rejected as evidence when offered on the trial of the cause. The objection was, that the written notice of the filing of the interrogatories, required by section 2320 of the Code, had not been given. Section 2328 of the Code directs, that “all objections to the admissibility of the entire deposition in evidence, must be made before entering-on the trial, and not after; unless the matter is not disclosed in the deposition, and appears after the commencement of the trial.” The objection went to the entire deposition. It was not within the exception allowed by the statute. It therefore could not be made on the trial.—McGill v. Monette, 37 Ala. 49; Thompson v. Rawles, 33 Ala. 29; McArthur v. Carrie, 32 Ala. 75. If it'be admitted that any excuse can be allowed for the failure to make the objection before the trial, the facts disclosed in the record certainly constitute none, which ought to be entertained.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McArthur v. Carrie's Adm'r
32 Ala. 75 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1858)
Thompson v. Rawles
33 Ala. 29 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1858)
McGill v. Monette
37 Ala. 49 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1860)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 Ala. 473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cornelius-v-partain-ala-1864.