Cornelius v. Howell

Fourth Circuit

Cornelius v. Howell

251 F. App'x 246

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 22, 2007·No. No. 07-1514·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Nadine Cornelius appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cornelius v. Howell, No. 3:06-cv-03387-MBS (D.S.C. Jan. 31, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Nadine Cornelius appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cornelius v. Howell, No. 3:06-cv-03387-MBS (D.S.C. Jan. 31, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cornelius v. Howell, 251 F. App'x 246 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

251 F. App'x 246 (Cornelius v. Howell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related