Cornelius Tucker, Jr. v. Regina Brooks Hazel Keith Lynn Phillips Warden French Juanita H. Baker

Fourth Circuit

Cornelius Tucker, Jr. v. Regina Brooks Hazel Keith Lynn Phillips Warden French Juanita H. Baker

60 F.3d 825, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24960, 1995 WL 384512

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 29, 1995

Docket95-6558

StatusPublished

This text of 60 F.3d 825 (Cornelius Tucker, Jr. v. Regina Brooks Hazel Keith Lynn Phillips Warden French Juanita H. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cornelius Tucker, Jr. v. Regina Brooks Hazel Keith Lynn Phillips Warden French Juanita H. Baker, 60 F.3d 825, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24960, 1995 WL 384512 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

60 F.3d 825
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Cornelius TUCKER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Regina BROOKS; Hazel Keith; Lynn Phillips; Warden French;
Juanita H. Baker, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6558.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 1995
Decided June 29, 1995

Cornelius Tucker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying leave to file a 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint for failing to comply with a pre-filing injunction. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tucker v. Brooks, No. CA-94-167-5-MC-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 21, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

60 F.3d 825
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Cornelius TUCKER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Regina BROOKS; Hazel Keith; Lynn Phillips; Warden French;
Juanita H. Baker, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6558.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 1995
Decided June 29, 1995

Cornelius Tucker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying leave to file a 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint for failing to comply with a pre-filing injunction. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tucker v. Brooks, No. CA-94-167-5-MC-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 21, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 F.3d 825, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24960, 1995 WL 384512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cornelius-tucker-jr-v-regina-brooks-hazel-keith-ly-ca4-1995.