Cornelius Singleton v. Morris Thigpen, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections
831 F.2d 973, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 14914
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cornelius Singleton v. Morris Thigpen, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections. Read the opinion of the Court — 847 F.2d 668 →
Opinion
The district court certified that there exists probable cause for an appeal. This Court is unable to resolve the merits of petitioner’s appeal before the scheduled execution. Accordingly, the execution of petitioner is ORDERED STAYED pending further order of this Court. See Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 103 S.Ct. 3383, 77 L.Ed.2d 1090 (1983).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cornelius Singleton v. Morris Thigpen, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, 831 F.2d 973, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 14914 (11th Cir. 1987).
831 F.2d 973 (Cornelius Singleton v. Morris Thigpen, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barefoot v. Estelle
463 U.S. 880 (Supreme Court, 1983)