Cornelius Austin Long, Jr. v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline
This text of Cornelius Austin Long, Jr. v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline (Cornelius Austin Long, Jr. v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 2, 2010.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-09-01033-CV
CORNELIUS AUSTIN LONG, JR., Appellant
V.
COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE, Appellee
On Appeal from the 269th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2009-24590
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
This is an appeal from a judgment signed November 18, 2009. The clerk’s record was filed May 6, 2010. The reporter’s record was filed May 3, 2010. Appellant’s brief was originally due June 7, 2010, but it was not filed. Appellant was granted two extensions of time to file his brief until September 30, 2010. No brief or further motion for extension of time has been filed.
On November 4, 2010, this court issued an order stating that unless appellant filed his brief and a motion reasonably explaining why the brief was late, on or before November 19, 2010, the court would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). Appellant had not filed a brief or any other response to the court’s order.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Seymore, Boyce and Christopher.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cornelius Austin Long, Jr. v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cornelius-austin-long-jr-v-commission-for-lawyer-d-texapp-2010.