Cornejo v. Minglana

District Court, N.D. California·Decided July 9, 2024·No. 4:23-cv-05383·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 6 7 EFRAIN CORNEJO, Case No. 23-cv-05383-JSW

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO VACATE SETTLEMENT 9 v. PROCEEDINGS; DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS; LIFTING STAY; 10 SERGEANT V. MINGLANA, et al., SCHEDULING MOTION BRIEFING 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 16, 17

12 Good cause appearing, Defendants’ motion to vacate the settlement proceedings is 13 GRANTED. Defendants’ motion to dismiss is DENIED without prejudice because it violates the 14 stay. (See ECF No. 9.) The stay is now lifted. Defendants may re-file their motion to dismiss 15 according to the schedule below, and the case may be referred back for settlement following 16 resolution of such a motion. 17 1. No later than August 24, 2024, Defendants shall file a motion to dismiss or other 18 dispositive motion. 19 2. Plaintiff's opposition to the dispositive motion, if any, shall be filed with the court and 20 served upon defendanst no later than September 9, 2024. 21 3. Defendants shall file a reply brief no later than September 23, 2024. 22 4. The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due. No hearing 23 will be held on the motion unless the court so orders at a later date. 24 5. All communications by the plaintiff with the court must be served on defendant, or 25 defendants’ counsel once counsel has been designated, by mailing a true copy of the document to 26 defendant or their counsel. 27 6. Discovery may be taken in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. No 1 before the parties may conduct discovery. 2 Plaintiff is reminded that state prisoners inmates may review all non-confidential material 3 in their medical and central files, pursuant to In re Olson, 37 Cal. App. 3d 783 (Cal. Ct. App. 4 1974); 15 California Code of Regulations § 3370; and the CDCR’s Department Operations 5 Manual §§ 13030.4, 13030.16, 13030.16.1-13030.16.3, 13030.21, and 71010.11.1. Requests to 6 review these files or for copies of materials in them must be made directly to prison officials, not 7 to the court. 8 7. It is the plaintiff's responsibility to prosecute this case. Plaintiff must keep the court 9 informed of any change of address and must comply with the court's orders in a timely fashion. 10 Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute pursuant to ll Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 5 13 Dated: July 9, 2024 a7 Cal Lhe JEPFREN/S, WHITE 16 United ;ptates strict Judge ( 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cornejo v. Minglana, (N.D. Cal. 2024).

Cornejo v. Minglana (Cornejo v. Minglana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Olson
37 Cal. App. 3d 783 (California Court of Appeal, 1974)