Corneal v. State
632 So. 2d 644, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1020, 1994 WL 28850
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 4, 1994·No. No. 93-111·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We find no error in the judgment or sentence save in the assessment of a “state attorney’s fee,” which is herewith stricken.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; SENTENCE MODIFIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Corneal v. State, 632 So. 2d 644, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1020, 1994 WL 28850 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
632 So. 2d 644 (Corneal v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. State
632 So. 2d 644 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)