Corn v. Shapiro

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Corn v. Shapiro

111 N.Y.S. 727

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 30, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 111 N.Y.S. 727 (Corn v. Shapiro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Corn v. Shapiro, 111 N.Y.S. 727 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On February 1, 1907, the defendant went into possession of certain premises belonging to the plaintiff under a three-year lease, at $1,300 per annum, payable the 1st of each month, and providing for the payment of a proportionate part of the Croton water charges. The defendant abandoned the premises on November 15, 1907, but paid the rental for December and January. This action is for the unpaid rental of February and March, 1908, aggregating $216.-66, and for a proportionate part of the Croton water charges, estimated at $18.75. To the claim for rental was set up a plea of constructive eviction month by month from the very beginning, through leakage of the roof. This, under the evidence, was properly held no defense, and in so far the direction of the verdict should stand; but as the water charges were determined by the meter, and the defendant could not have used any during the months when he did not occupy the premises, the judgment should be reduced by $18.75, and, as so reduced, should be affirmed, with costs.

The judgment appealed from is modified, by reducing the amount thereof to $240.47, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs to either party.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On February 1, 1907, the defendant went into possession of certain premises belonging to the plaintiff under a three-year lease, at $1,300 per annum, payable the 1st of each month, and providing for the payment of a proportionate part of the Croton water charges. The defendant abandoned the premises on November 15, 1907, but paid the rental for December and January. This action is for the unpaid rental of February and March, 1908, aggregating $216.-66, and for a proportionate part of the Croton water charges, estimated at $18.75. To the claim for rental was set up a plea of constructive eviction month by month from the very beginning, through leakage of the roof. This, under the evidence, was properly held no defense, and in so far the direction of the verdict should stand; but as the water charges were determined by the meter, and the defendant could not have used any during the months when he did not occupy the premises, the judgment should be reduced by $18.75, and, as so reduced, should be affirmed, with costs.

The judgment appealed from is modified, by reducing the amount thereof to $240.47, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs to either party.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 N.Y.S. 727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corn-v-shapiro-nyappterm-1908.