Corn v. Corn

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Corn v. Corn

477 So. 2d 8, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2205, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16009

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 25, 1985

DocketNos. 85-4, 85-21

StatusPublished

This text of 477 So. 2d 8 (Corn v. Corn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Corn v. Corn, 477 So. 2d 8, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2205, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16009 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm both the trial court’s order of temporary support and the subsequent order of contempt, finding that there is competent substantial evidence in the record to support both orders. Notwithstanding our affirmance, we are distressed at the failure by both parties to place before the trial [9]*9court complete and verifiable evidence of each party’s financial posture. Our affirmance is without prejudice to either side to seek further relief in the trial court.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm both the trial court’s order of temporary support and the subsequent order of contempt, finding that there is competent substantial evidence in the record to support both orders. Notwithstanding our affirmance, we are distressed at the failure by both parties to place before the trial [9]*9court complete and verifiable evidence of each party’s financial posture. Our affirmance is without prejudice to either side to seek further relief in the trial court.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

477 So. 2d 8, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2205, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16009, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corn-v-corn-fladistctapp-1985.