Corn Products Refining Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Corn Products Refining Co. v. United States

8 Cust. Ct. 758, 1942 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 737

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJune 3, 1942

DocketNo. 5653; Entry No. 412-H

StatusPublished

This text of 8 Cust. Ct. 758 (Corn Products Refining Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Corn Products Refining Co. v. United States, 8 Cust. Ct. 758, 1942 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 737 (cusc 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Kincheloe, Judge:

This appeal to reappraisement involves the valuation of certain corn gluten feed exported from Argentina and entered at the port of Houston, Tex.

Plaintiff’s exhibit 1, which was received in evidence without objection, is a letter signed by the acting appraiser at Houston, Tex., and addressed to the deputy collector in charge at the same port.

In said exhibit 1, the acting appraiser states that he made a mistake when making his appraisement, and that it was his intention to appraise the instant merchandise at Argentine pesos 42.01 less 4.2 per centum nondutiable charges.

I therefore find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and that such value is Argentine pesos 42.01 per 1,000 kilos gross, less 4.2 per centum for nondutiable charges, packed. Judgment will be • rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kincheloe, Judge:

This appeal to reappraisement involves the valuation of certain corn gluten feed exported from Argentina and entered at the port of Houston, Tex.

Plaintiff’s exhibit 1, which was received in evidence without objection, is a letter signed by the acting appraiser at Houston, Tex., and addressed to the deputy collector in charge at the same port.

In said exhibit 1, the acting appraiser states that he made a mistake when making his appraisement, and that it was his intention to appraise the instant merchandise at Argentine pesos 42.01 less 4.2 per centum nondutiable charges.

I therefore find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and that such value is Argentine pesos 42.01 per 1,000 kilos gross, less 4.2 per centum for nondutiable charges, packed. Judgment will be • rendered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 Cust. Ct. 758, 1942 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corn-products-refining-co-v-united-states-cusc-1942.