Corn Exchange Bank Trust Co. v. Pastore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Corn Exchange Bank Trust Co. v. Pastore

282 A.D. 855, 124 N.Y.S.2d 411, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5204

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 6, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D. 855 (Corn Exchange Bank Trust Co. v. Pastore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Corn Exchange Bank Trust Co. v. Pastore, 282 A.D. 855, 124 N.Y.S.2d 411, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5204 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying motion to vacate warrant of attachment unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent. Defendants are entitled, should they so desire, to amend their answer or to move with respect to the amended complaint. The complaint, containing an improper as well as a proper cause of action for purposes of obtaining a warrant of attachment, was not incorporated by reference in the affidavit of application nor does it appear that the complaint was necessary to the granting of the application. The mere reference to its issuance and annexation to the application does not require [856]*856therefore that the warrant be vacated on the authority of Brown v. Chaminade Velours (176 Mise. 238, affd. 261 App. Div. 1071). The Brown case involved a complaint that was necessary to the granting of the attachment, and which had been incorporated by reference. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Breitel and Botein, JJ. [See 204 Misc. 926, 928.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion to vacate warrant of attachment unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent. Defendants are entitled, should they so desire, to amend their answer or to move with respect to the amended complaint. The complaint, containing an improper as well as a proper cause of action for purposes of obtaining a warrant of attachment, was not incorporated by reference in the affidavit of application nor does it appear that the complaint was necessary to the granting of the application. The mere reference to its issuance and annexation to the application does not require [856]*856therefore that the warrant be vacated on the authority of Brown v. Chaminade Velours (176 Mise. 238, affd. 261 App. Div. 1071). The Brown case involved a complaint that was necessary to the granting of the attachment, and which had been incorporated by reference. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Breitel and Botein, JJ. [See 204 Misc. 926, 928.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D. 855, 124 N.Y.S.2d 411, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corn-exchange-bank-trust-co-v-pastore-nyappdiv-1953.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack