Cormier v. Curators of the Univ. of Mo.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Cormier v. Curators of the Univ. of Mo.

555 S.W.3d 479

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 29, 2018

DocketWD 80980

StatusPublished

This text of 555 S.W.3d 479 (Cormier v. Curators of the Univ. of Mo.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cormier v. Curators of the Univ. of Mo., 555 S.W.3d 479 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Marie-Helen Cormier appeals the judgment of the Boone County Circuit Court granting summary judgment against her and dismissing her cause of action with prejudice. She argues in four points on appeal that the trial court erred because it misapplied law, overlooked her evidence, and misread her petition. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Marie-Helen Cormier appeals the judgment of the Boone County Circuit Court granting summary judgment against her and dismissing her cause of action with prejudice. She argues in four points on appeal that the trial court erred because it misapplied law, overlooked her evidence, and misread her petition. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

555 S.W.3d 479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cormier-v-curators-of-the-univ-of-mo-moctapp-2018.