Corley's ex'r v. Evans
Opinion
delivered the opinion op the court:
Whether right or wrong on the facts which may have been actually exhibited in the circuit court, we cannot judicially know. Those facts do not appear in the record in a cognizable form. The document professing to state them, and styled a bill of exceptions, does not appear to have been either signed or filed in court; but, as time was allowed for completing it in vacation, the presumption is, that it was prepared and signed extra-judicially out of court, and is, therefore, according to the Code of Practice, unauthorized and void.
We are, therefore, not permitted to notice it judicially ; and, consequently, as we must, in the absence of testimony to the contrary, presume that the verdict was authorized by the proof and the judgment consequently right, we cannot reverse.
Wherefore, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
67 Ky. 409 (Corley's ex'r v. Evans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.