Corley v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Corley v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

708 So. 2d 697, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4789, 1998 WL 210344

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 1, 1998

DocketNo. 97-2172

StatusPublished

This text of 708 So. 2d 697 (Corley v. Unemployment Appeals Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Corley v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 708 So. 2d 697, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4789, 1998 WL 210344 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Paul Corley appeals the final order entered by the State of Florida, Unemployment Appeals Commission (UAC), affirming the decision of the appeals referee that he was not entitled to receive unemployment compensation benefits. Under Florida law, a worker who elects to terminate his or her employment without good cause attributable to the employer is not eligible to receive unemployment compensation benefits. See § 443.101, Fla. Stat. (1997). The record evidence supports the conclusion reached by the appeals referee that Corley did not sustain his burden of proving that “he voluntarily quit his job with good cause attributable to his employing unit.” Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, W. SHARP and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Paul Corley appeals the final order entered by the State of Florida, Unemployment Appeals Commission (UAC), affirming the decision of the appeals referee that he was not entitled to receive unemployment compensation benefits. Under Florida law, a worker who elects to terminate his or her employment without good cause attributable to the employer is not eligible to receive unemployment compensation benefits. See § 443.101, Fla. Stat. (1997). The record evidence supports the conclusion reached by the appeals referee that Corley did not sustain his burden of proving that “he voluntarily quit his job with good cause attributable to his employing unit.” Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, W. SHARP and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

708 So. 2d 697, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4789, 1998 WL 210344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corley-v-unemployment-appeals-commission-fladistctapp-1998.