Corley v. Russi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Corley v. Russi

206 A.D.2d 946, 616 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7903

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 15, 1994·Published

Opinion

Appeal unanimously dismissed. Memorandum: This appeal has been rendered moot by petitioner’s release on parole (see, Matter of Wright v Rodriguez, 173 AD2d 1078; see also, People ex rel. Guggenheim v Mucci, 31 NY2d 957; Matter of Smith v New-berry, 154 AD2d 941, lv denied 75 NY2d 705). Because this proceeding does not raise an issue likely to escape judicial review, it presents no exception to the mootness doctrine (see, Matter of Wright v Rodriguez, supra; Matter of Smith v Newberry, supra). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Livingston County, Houston, J.—Article 78.) Present—Green, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal unanimously dismissed. Memorandum: This appeal has been rendered moot by petitioner’s release on parole (see, Matter of Wright v Rodriguez, 173 AD2d 1078; see also, People ex rel. Guggenheim v Mucci, 31 NY2d 957; Matter of Smith v New-berry, 154 AD2d 941, lv denied 75 NY2d 705). Because this proceeding does not raise an issue likely to escape judicial review, it presents no exception to the mootness doctrine (see, Matter of Wright v Rodriguez, supra; Matter of Smith v Newberry, supra). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Livingston County, Houston, J.—Article 78.) Present—Green, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.

Corley v. Russi, 206 A.D.2d 946, 616 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

206 A.D.2d 946 (Corley v. Russi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related