Corlett v. Crawford

Supreme Court of Colorado

Corlett v. Crawford

109 P.2d 638, 107 Colo. 149, 1941 Colo. LEXIS 265

CourtSupreme Court of Colorado

DecidedJanuary 20, 1941

DocketNo. 14,673.

StatusPublished

This text of 109 P.2d 638 (Corlett v. Crawford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Corlett v. Crawford, 109 P.2d 638, 107 Colo. 149, 1941 Colo. LEXIS 265 (Colo. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

At the oral argument in this case the sole question relied upon by plaintiff in error was the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict of the jury. After a careful study of the record, we are of the opinion that it contains some conflicting evidence on material issues. While the evidence of plaintiff in error may seem to us to be more consistent with the physical facts, yet, in view of the verdict, based upon conflict, we are not disposed to invade the province of the jury and disturb its verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

At the oral argument in this case the sole question relied upon by plaintiff in error was the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict of the jury. After a careful study of the record, we are of the opinion that it contains some conflicting evidence on material issues. While the evidence of plaintiff in error may seem to us to be more consistent with the physical facts, yet, in view of the verdict, based upon conflict, we are not disposed to invade the province of the jury and disturb its verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 P.2d 638, 107 Colo. 149, 1941 Colo. LEXIS 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corlett-v-crawford-colo-1941.