Corl v. Huron & Eastern Railway Co.
868 N.W.2d 914, 498 Mich. 878
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 16, 2015·No. No. 150970; Court of Appeals No. 319004·Published
Opinion
The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing: (1) whether the Court of Appeals decision conflicts with Paddock v Tuscola & Saginaw Bay Railway Company, 225 Mich App 526 (1997), and MCL 462.317; and (2) whether Paddock was correctly decided. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Corl v. Huron & Eastern Railway Co., 868 N.W.2d 914, 498 Mich. 878 (Mich. 2015).
868 N.W.2d 914 (Corl v. Huron & Eastern Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Paddock v. Tuscola & Saginaw Bay Railway Co.
571 N.W.2d 564 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1997)