Corl v. Huron & Eastern Railway Co.
868 N.W.2d 914, 498 Mich. 878
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 16, 2015
DocketNo. 150970; Court of Appeals No. 319004
StatusPublished
This text of 868 N.W.2d 914 (Corl v. Huron & Eastern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Corl v. Huron & Eastern Railway Co., 868 N.W.2d 914, 498 Mich. 878 (Mich. 2015).
Opinion
The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing: (1) whether the Court of Appeals decision conflicts with Paddock v Tuscola & Saginaw Bay Railway Company, 225 Mich App 526 (1997), and MCL 462.317; and (2) whether Paddock was correctly decided. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Paddock v. Tuscola & Saginaw Bay Railway Co.
571 N.W.2d 564 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1997)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
868 N.W.2d 914, 498 Mich. 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corl-v-huron-eastern-railway-co-mich-2015.