Corkill v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance
181 F. App'x 935
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided May 26, 2006·No. No. 05-13088·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
After review and oral argument, we find no reversible error in the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant Hartford Life on plaintiff Teresa Corkill’s ERISA claims.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Corkill v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance, 181 F. App'x 935 (11th Cir. 2006).
181 F. App'x 935 (Corkill v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Maye v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2024
United States v. Lisbon
835 F. Supp. 2d 1329 (N.D. Georgia, 2011)
G.M. v. State
981 So. 2d 529 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
United States v. Reynolds
526 F. Supp. 2d 1330 (N.D. Georgia, 2007)