Corkill v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance
181 F. App'x 935
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedMay 26, 2006
DocketNo. 05-13088
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases
This text of 181 F. App'x 935 (Corkill v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Corkill v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance, 181 F. App'x 935 (11th Cir. 2006).
Opinion
After review and oral argument, we find no reversible error in the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant Hartford Life on plaintiff Teresa Corkill’s ERISA claims.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Maye v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2024
United States v. Lisbon
835 F. Supp. 2d 1329 (N.D. Georgia, 2011)
G.M. v. State
981 So. 2d 529 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
United States v. Reynolds
526 F. Supp. 2d 1330 (N.D. Georgia, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
181 F. App'x 935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corkill-v-hartford-life-accident-insurance-ca11-2006.