Corker v. Ake

164 P. 87, 30 Idaho 218, 1917 Ida. LEXIS 24
Idaho Supreme Court·Decided March 20, 1917·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By stipulation, the above-entitled case is submitted with the case of Corker v. Cowen, ante, p. 213, 164 Pac. 85, the record in the latter case to constitute the record in the above-entitled case, with the following exception, to wit:

“That either of the parties to this action may introduce such additional evidence as they shall desire, and shall offer such modifications and reoffers of evidence as they shall desire.”

At the trial certain additional evidence was introduced by both parties to this action, but we do not think that any of the evidence so introduced materially differentiates the instant case from that of Corker v. Cowen, supra. On the authority of that case the judgment of the district court is affirmed. Costs awarded to respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Corker v. Ake, 164 P. 87, 30 Idaho 218, 1917 Ida. LEXIS 24 (Idaho 1917).

164 P. 87 (Corker v. Ake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Corker v. Cowen
164 P. 85 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1917)