Corker v. Ake
This text of 164 P. 87 (Corker v. Ake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By stipulation, the above-entitled case is submitted with the case of Corker v. Cowen, ante, p. 213, 164 Pac. 85, the record in the latter case to constitute the record in the above-entitled case, with the following exception, to wit:
“That either of the parties to this action may introduce such additional evidence as they shall desire, and shall offer such modifications and reoffers of evidence as they shall desire.”
At the trial certain additional evidence was introduced by both parties to this action, but we do not think that any of the evidence so introduced materially differentiates the instant case from that of Corker v. Cowen, supra. On the authority of that case the judgment of the district court is affirmed. Costs awarded to respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
164 P. 87, 30 Idaho 218, 1917 Ida. LEXIS 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corker-v-ake-idaho-1917.