Coriou v. Department of Mental Hygiene

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Coriou v. Department of Mental Hygiene

80 A.D.2d 597, 436 N.Y.S.2d 38, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10283

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 17, 1981

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 80 A.D.2d 597 (Coriou v. Department of Mental Hygiene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coriou v. Department of Mental Hygiene, 80 A.D.2d 597, 436 N.Y.S.2d 38, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10283 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to' section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated January 28, 1980, which affirmed a determination of the State Division of Human Rights, dated July 5, 1979, which (1) held that there was no probable cause to believe that the respondent-employer had engaged in unlawful discriminatory practices resulting in the termination of petitioner’s employment, and (2) dismissed petitioner’s complaint. Order confirmed and proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements. On the record before this court, we can find no support for petitioner’s claim that the termination of his employment was racially motivated. To the contrary, said termination was mandated by the Civil Service Law which provides for the creation of, and hiring from, preferred lists of employment (see Civil Service Law, § 81). Damiani, J.P., Laser, Cohalan and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to' section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated January 28, 1980, which affirmed a determination of the State Division of Human Rights, dated July 5, 1979, which (1) held that there was no probable cause to believe that the respondent-employer had engaged in unlawful discriminatory practices resulting in the termination of petitioner’s employment, and (2) dismissed petitioner’s complaint. Order confirmed and proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements. On the record before this court, we can find no support for petitioner’s claim that the termination of his employment was racially motivated. To the contrary, said termination was mandated by the Civil Service Law which provides for the creation of, and hiring from, preferred lists of employment (see Civil Service Law, § 81). Damiani, J.P., Laser, Cohalan and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 A.D.2d 597, 436 N.Y.S.2d 38, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coriou-v-department-of-mental-hygiene-nyappdiv-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack