Corinne Frellsen v. Ingard O. Johannessen, Trustee in Banrkuptcy, in the Matter of Leonard W. Gunzburg, D/B/A Manners Jewelers
This text of 289 F.2d 925 (Corinne Frellsen v. Ingard O. Johannessen, Trustee in Banrkuptcy, in the Matter of Leonard W. Gunzburg, D/B/A Manners Jewelers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The issues in this case were submitted to a jury under instructions which are not here questioned, and the jury verdict was for the plaintiff. From a judgment on that verdict, the defendant has appealed. It is contended that the evidence *926 was such that a verdict should have been directed for the defendant. The evidence, which we need not recite, was sufficient to present a jury question and to sustain the verdict which the jury rendered. The judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
289 F.2d 925, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corinne-frellsen-v-ingard-o-johannessen-trustee-in-banrkuptcy-in-the-ca5-1961.