Corinne Frellsen v. Ingard O. Johannessen, Trustee in Banrkuptcy, in the Matter of Leonard W. Gunzburg, D/B/A Manners Jewelers

289 F.2d 925, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4503
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 15, 1961·No. 18777_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The issues in this case were submitted to a jury under instructions which are not here questioned, and the jury verdict was for the plaintiff. From a judgment on that verdict, the defendant has appealed. It is contended that the evidence *926 was such that a verdict should have been directed for the defendant. The evidence, which we need not recite, was sufficient to present a jury question and to sustain the verdict which the jury rendered. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Corinne Frellsen v. Ingard O. Johannessen, Trustee in Banrkuptcy, in the Matter of Leonard W. Gunzburg, D/B/A Manners Jewelers, 289 F.2d 925, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4503 (5th Cir. 1961).

289 F.2d 925 (Corinne Frellsen v. Ingard O. Johannessen, Trustee in Banrkuptcy, in the Matter of Leonard W. Gunzburg, D/B/A Manners Jewelers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related