Corham Artificial Flower Co. v. United States
62 Cust. Ct. 1071, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3376
United States Customs Court·Decided March 3, 1969·No. No. P69/56; protests 66/61027, 67/65678, and 67/68858 (New York)·Published
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of artificial flowers, trees, foliage, fruits, vegetables, grasses, or grains, and articles made of the foregoing, in chief value of plastic, assembled in the same manner as the merchandise the subject of Armbee Corporation et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 105, C.D. 3278) and Zunold Trading Corporation et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 112, C.D. 3279), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Corham Artificial Flower Co. v. United States, 62 Cust. Ct. 1071, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3376 (cusc 1969).
62 Cust. Ct. 1071 (Corham Artificial Flower Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Armbee Corp. v. United States
60 Cust. Ct. 105 (U.S. Customs Court, 1968)
Zunold Trading Corp. v. United States
60 Cust. Ct. 112 (U.S. Customs Court, 1968)