Home/U.S. Customs Court/Corham Artificial Flower Co. v. United States

Corham Artificial Flower Co. v. United States

62 Cust. Ct. 1071, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3376
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMarch 3, 1969
DocketNo. P69/56; protests 66/61027, 67/65678, and 67/68858 (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 62 Cust. Ct. 1071 (Corham Artificial Flower Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Corham Artificial Flower Co. v. United States, 62 Cust. Ct. 1071, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3376 (cusc 1969).

Opinion

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of artificial flowers, trees, foliage, fruits, vegetables, grasses, or grains, and articles made of the foregoing, in chief value of plastic, assembled in the same manner as the merchandise the subject of Armbee Corporation et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 105, C.D. 3278) and Zunold Trading Corporation et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 112, C.D. 3279), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Armbee Corp. v. United States
60 Cust. Ct. 105 (U.S. Customs Court, 1968)
Zunold Trading Corp. v. United States
60 Cust. Ct. 112 (U.S. Customs Court, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 Cust. Ct. 1071, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corham-artificial-flower-co-v-united-states-cusc-1969.