Corfield v. Klein

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Corfield v. Klein

34 A. 435, 173 Pa. 363, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 709

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 27, 1896

DocketAppeal, No. 403

StatusPublished

This text of 34 A. 435 (Corfield v. Klein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Corfield v. Klein, 34 A. 435, 173 Pa. 363, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 709 (Pa. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We are not convinced that the learned' court erred in discharging plaintiffs’ rule for an issue, etc., or in making absolute the rule on plaintiffs to give security for the costs of audit in distribution of the fund in court. We find nothing in either of the assignments of error that requires discussion. They are both dismissed.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by the plaintiffs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

We are not convinced that the learned' court erred in discharging plaintiffs’ rule for an issue, etc., or in making absolute the rule on plaintiffs to give security for the costs of audit in distribution of the fund in court. We find nothing in either of the assignments of error that requires discussion. They are both dismissed.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by the plaintiffs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 A. 435, 173 Pa. 363, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corfield-v-klein-pa-1896.