Corey v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Corey v. State

454 S.E.2d 154, 216 Ga. App. 180, 95 Fulton County D. Rep. 436, 1995 Ga. App. LEXIS 78

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 31, 1995

DocketA94A2088

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 454 S.E.2d 154 (Corey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Corey v. State, 454 S.E.2d 154, 216 Ga. App. 180, 95 Fulton County D. Rep. 436, 1995 Ga. App. LEXIS 78 (Ga. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Ruffin, Judge.

Michael J. Corey appeals from his sentence of life imprisonment for armed robbery.

In his sole enumeration of error, Corey contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to modify his sentence. Corey argues that OCGA § 16-8-41 (b), under which he was sentenced, is unconstitutionally vague because it provides two maximum sentences, one of life imprisonment and another of 20 years. We disagree.

OCGA § 16-8-41 (b) provides in pertinent part that “[a] person convicted of the offense of armed robbery shall be punished by death or imprisonment for life or by imprisonment for not less than five nor more than 20 years. . . .” Although the statute allows the sentencing judge broad discretion, it does not provide two different maximum sentences and is not unconstitutionally vague. The courts of this state have consistently held that “[t]he maximum penalty upon conviction [181]*181for armed robbery is life imprisonment.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Getty v. State, 207 Ga. App. 736, 738 (429 SE2d 100) (1993). As an alternative to imposing this maximum sentence, under OCGA § 16-8-41 (b), a court also has the discretion to impose a determinable sentence of any period of time between five and twenty years. See Thornton v. State, 226 Ga. 837 (2) (178 SE2d 193) (1970).

Decided January 31, 1995. Michael J. Corey, pro se. T. Joseph Campbell, District Attorney, for appellee.

“Where the sentence is within the limits established by law, this court may not control the discretion of the trial court in imposing punishment. [Cits.]” Flagg v. State, 187 Ga. App. 297, 299 (2) (370 SE2d 46) (1988). Since OCGA § 16-8-41 (b) is clear in its provision for a maximum sentence of life imprisonment, and the sentence of life imprisonment imposed by the trial court in this case is within that limit, we find no error.

Judgment affirmed.

Birdsong, P. J., and Blackburn, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruffin, Judge.

Michael J. Corey appeals from his sentence of life imprisonment for armed robbery.

In his sole enumeration of error, Corey contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to modify his sentence. Corey argues that OCGA § 16-8-41 (b), under which he was sentenced, is unconstitutionally vague because it provides two maximum sentences, one of life imprisonment and another of 20 years. We disagree.

OCGA § 16-8-41 (b) provides in pertinent part that “[a] person convicted of the offense of armed robbery shall be punished by death or imprisonment for life or by imprisonment for not less than five nor more than 20 years. . . .” Although the statute allows the sentencing judge broad discretion, it does not provide two different maximum sentences and is not unconstitutionally vague. The courts of this state have consistently held that “[t]he maximum penalty upon conviction [181]*181for armed robbery is life imprisonment.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Getty v. State, 207 Ga. App. 736, 738 (429 SE2d 100) (1993). As an alternative to imposing this maximum sentence, under OCGA § 16-8-41 (b), a court also has the discretion to impose a determinable sentence of any period of time between five and twenty years. See Thornton v. State, 226 Ga. 837 (2) (178 SE2d 193) (1970).

Decided January 31, 1995. Michael J. Corey, pro se. T. Joseph Campbell, District Attorney, for appellee.

“Where the sentence is within the limits established by law, this court may not control the discretion of the trial court in imposing punishment. [Cits.]” Flagg v. State, 187 Ga. App. 297, 299 (2) (370 SE2d 46) (1988). Since OCGA § 16-8-41 (b) is clear in its provision for a maximum sentence of life imprisonment, and the sentence of life imprisonment imposed by the trial court in this case is within that limit, we find no error.

Judgment affirmed.

Birdsong, P. J., and Blackburn, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

454 S.E.2d 154, 216 Ga. App. 180, 95 Fulton County D. Rep. 436, 1995 Ga. App. LEXIS 78, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corey-v-state-gactapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack