Corey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Corey v. State

534 So. 2d 886, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2646, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5340, 1988 WL 129086

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 7, 1988

DocketNo. 88-1152

StatusPublished

This text of 534 So. 2d 886 (Corey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Corey v. State, 534 So. 2d 886, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2646, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5340, 1988 WL 129086 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The parties agree that this case should be remanded with direction that the defendant be afforded notice and the opportunity to be heard upon the imposition of costs. Accordingly, we vacate the trial court’s imposition of costs, which is the sole basis for [887]*887this appeal, and remand with the above direction.

That it took this appeal, and its cost in legal, clerical and judicial time, to correct this error, is lamentable.

GLICKSTEIN, WALDEN and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The parties agree that this case should be remanded with direction that the defendant be afforded notice and the opportunity to be heard upon the imposition of costs. Accordingly, we vacate the trial court’s imposition of costs, which is the sole basis for [887]*887this appeal, and remand with the above direction.

That it took this appeal, and its cost in legal, clerical and judicial time, to correct this error, is lamentable.

GLICKSTEIN, WALDEN and STONE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

534 So. 2d 886, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2646, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5340, 1988 WL 129086, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corey-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.