Corey v. Renard
This text of 260 S.E.2d 538 (Corey v. Renard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We granted this interlocutory appeal to deal with the trial court’s imposing the sanction of default judgment against appellant-defendant. The court imposed that sanction under CPA § 37 (d) (Code Ann. § 81A-137 (d)), for appellant’s failure to answer interrogatories propounded by appellee Renard. However, appellant had timely filed a motion for a protective order concerning the interrogatories. The court never ruled upon appellant’s motion. While the protective order was pending, the entry of default judgment under CPA § 37 (d) was erroneous. See CPA § 37(d).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
260 S.E.2d 538, 151 Ga. App. 584, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corey-v-renard-gactapp-1979.