Corey v. Reich
Opinion
Timothy Corey appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendants and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state a constitutional violation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Corey v. Reich, No. CA-02-2801 (D.S.C. Mar. 9, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
103 F. App'x 753 (Corey v. Reich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.