Corey v. Probate Judge for Jackson County

23 N.W. 205, 56 Mich. 524
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedApril 29, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 23 N.W. 205 (Corey v. Probate Judge for Jackson County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Corey v. Probate Judge for Jackson County, 23 N.W. 205, 56 Mich. 524 (Mich. 1885).

Opinion

Campbell, J.

This is a proceeding by certiorari to review the action of a special drain commissioner appointed by the probate judge of Jackson county to lay a drain in two counties- — Jackson and "Washtenaw. As respondents have not thought it worth while to attempt any defense of the proceedings, it is not desirable to discuss them at large.

Apart from the question of the power of the probate judge to make the appointment of the official complained of, it is objected, and the record sustains the objection, that the commissioner was appointed ex parte on the same day the application for his appointment was filed, and without notice to any one. This defect is a radical one, showing the probate [525]*525court had no jurisdiction to act, and the subsequent errors need not be considered. The proceedings must be quashed as against the plaintiffs in certiorari.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Simms v. Ramsey
90 S.E. 842 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 N.W. 205, 56 Mich. 524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corey-v-probate-judge-for-jackson-county-mich-1885.