Corey v. Lugar

62 Ind. 60
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1878·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Perkins, J.

Proceeding to contest an election. Appeal to the circuit court. Motion in that court to dismiss the .appeal on account of a defect in the appeal bond. The defect alleged was, that the bond was made payable to the 'State instead of to the appellee. The motion was overruled. There was no en’or in this. Sec. 790, 2 R. S. 1876, p. 311; Acts 1875, Reg. Sess., p. 112; Railsback v. Greve, 58 Ind. 72; Fuller v. Wright, 59 Ind. 333.

[61] The appellant moved for a trial by jury. The motion was denied. There was no error in this. Knox v. Fesler, 17 Ind. 254; Allen v. Anderson, 57 Ind. 888; Reynolds v. The State, 61 Ind. 892.

The cause was tried by the court, who found for the appellee upon the evidence, aud overruled a motion for a new trial, made upon the grounds that the decision of the court was not sustained by evidence, and was contrary to law.

The evidence ivas conflicting, and we cannot say the decision upon it was erroneous.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Corey v. Lugar, 62 Ind. 60 (Ind. 1878).

62 Ind. 60 (Corey v. Lugar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Taylor v. Carr
125 Tenn. 235 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1911)
Gordon v. Corning
92 N.E. 59 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1910)
Broden v. Thorpe Block Saving & Loan Ass'n
50 N.E. 403 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1898)
Bennett v. Seibert
35 N.E. 35 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1893)
Pedigo v. Grimes
13 N.E. 700 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1887)
Opp v. TenEyck
99 Ind. 345 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1884)
Miller v. O'Reilly
84 Ind. 168 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)