Corey v. Hiliker

Michigan Supreme Court

Corey v. Hiliker

15 Mich. 314

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedApril 20, 1867

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 15 Mich. 314 (Corey v. Hiliker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Corey v. Hiliker, 15 Mich. 314 (Mich. 1867).

Pincite

Opinion

This was a motion to strike from the docket for want of prosecution.

[315]*315It was resisted on the ground that four days notice of the hearing had not been given, according to the rules, one of the intervening days being Sunday. Notice of the motion was served on Saturday, March 30th, 1867, and the hearing was for Wednesday, April 3d, 1867. It was held that Sunday being an intervening day it was to be included in the computation, and that it was properly counted as a day. The notice, was held to be sufficient.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This was a motion to strike from the docket for want of prosecution.

[315]*315It was resisted on the ground that four days notice of the hearing had not been given, according to the rules, one of the intervening days being Sunday. Notice of the motion was served on Saturday, March 30th, 1867, and the hearing was for Wednesday, April 3d, 1867. It was held that Sunday being an intervening day it was to be included in the computation, and that it was properly counted as a day. The notice, was held to be sufficient.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 Mich. 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corey-v-hiliker-mich-1867.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack