Corey v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Corey v. City of New York

186 A.D.2d 434

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 186 A.D.2d 434 (Corey v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Corey v. City of New York, 186 A.D.2d 434 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Schoenfeld, J.), entered on or about December 16, 1991, denying defendant Murray Hill News Owners Corp.’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendant-appellant ("defendant”) Murray Hill News Owners Corp., the owner of property adjoining a municipal sidewalk which allegedly contained a defect, failed to meet its burden of demonstrating it did not actually cause the defect, and is not, therefore, entitled to summary judgment (Jimenez v City of New York, 179 AD2d 396). Defendant failed to conclusively establish that its managing agent’s construction crew did not effect repairs to the subject sidewalk area prior to the date of the accident. Concur — Carro, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Schoenfeld, J.), entered on or about December 16, 1991, denying defendant Murray Hill News Owners Corp.’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendant-appellant ("defendant”) Murray Hill News Owners Corp., the owner of property adjoining a municipal sidewalk which allegedly contained a defect, failed to meet its burden of demonstrating it did not actually cause the defect, and is not, therefore, entitled to summary judgment (Jimenez v City of New York, 179 AD2d 396). Defendant failed to conclusively establish that its managing agent’s construction crew did not effect repairs to the subject sidewalk area prior to the date of the accident. Concur — Carro, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger and Asch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 A.D.2d 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corey-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack