Corey v. Bolton

City of New York Municipal Court

Corey v. Bolton

30 Misc. 836, 61 N.Y.S. 917

DecidedDecember 15, 1899

StatusPublished

This text of 30 Misc. 836 (Corey v. Bolton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Corey v. Bolton, 30 Misc. 836, 61 N.Y.S. 917 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is not excessive, nor was it against the weight of evidence.

We think it was proper to allow the doctor to testify as to the nature and extent of the injuries inflicted upon plaintiff’s son, who was a minor.

Plaintiff’s right only was involved in this action, and as his son was a minor, he was not able to make the waiver, provided for by section 834, Code.

Under the circumstances the waiver of plaintiff was sufficient and proper.

No error was committed and judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Present: Fitzsimons, Ch. J.; O’Dwyeb and Scotchman, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI