Corey Thompson v. Amarylis Rosado, Dustin Gould, and Gregory Smith

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00509-CV

COREY THOMPSON APPELLANT

V.

AMARYLIS ROSADO, DUSTIN APPELLEES GOULD, AND GREGORY SMITH

------------

FROM THE 78TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

Appellant Corey Thompson filed his initial brief on March 2, 2012, and we

notified him by letter that same date that his brief did not comply with rules of

appellate procedure 9.4(h) and 38.1(d), (g), (i), and (k). We directed Thompson

to file an amended brief within ten days and explained that failure to do so may

result in striking his brief and dismissal of the appeal. Thompson has not

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. responded to our notice or filed an amended brief. Accordingly, we strike

Thompson’s brief and dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R.

App. P. 38.8(a), 38.9(a), 42.3(b), 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DELIVERED: April 12, 2012