Corey Thomas v. State
This text of Corey Thomas v. State (Corey Thomas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
COREY THOMAS,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D18-185
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed July 6, 2018
3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Kim Shepard, Judge.
Corey, Thomas, Jasper, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lori Hagan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant challenges the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure
3.850 motion. We find merit in Appellant’s challenge to the summary denial of claim 3
and, accordingly, reverse as to that claim. In all other respects, we affirm.
Claim 3 involves the contention that counsel was ineffective in advising Appellant
to withdraw a motion to sever the murder charge from the possession of a firearm by a convicted felon charge. The trial court concluded that this was an obvious trial strategy
that could be discerned conclusively from the records attached to the order. We disagree.
On remand, unless other records exist that conclusively refute this claim, the trial court
shall conduct an evidentiary hearing on claim 3.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
SAWAYA, PALMER and TORPY, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Corey Thomas v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corey-thomas-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.