Corey Ray Radcliff v. the State of Texas
This text of Corey Ray Radcliff v. the State of Texas (Corey Ray Radcliff v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-24-00198-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
COREY RAY RADCLIFF, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
ON APPEAL FROM THE 355TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOOD COUNTY, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Longoria, Tijerina, and Peña Memorandum Opinion by Justice Peña
This cause is before the Court on appellant’s motion to dismiss this appeal. 1 The
motion was signed by the appellant. Appellant’s counsel signed the certificate of service
and attached affidavit. We find the motion together with the certificate of service and
1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Second Court of Appeals pursuant to a docket
equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001. attached affidavit meets the requirement of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a)
that appellant and attorney must sign a written motion to dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 42.2(a).
Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is granted. Without passing on the merits of the
case, the appeal is hereby dismissed. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request,
no motion for rehearing will be entertained.
L. ARON PEÑA JR. Justice
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed on the 5th day of December, 2024.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Corey Ray Radcliff v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corey-ray-radcliff-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.