COREY R. CAPEHART v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 12, 2014
Docket13-5246
StatusPublished

This text of COREY R. CAPEHART v. State of Florida (COREY R. CAPEHART v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
COREY R. CAPEHART v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

COREY R. CAPEHART, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D13-5246

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 13, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Jackie L. Fulford, Judge.

John Edward Eagen of The Law Office of John Eagen, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Samuel Steinberg, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this direct appeal from a criminal judgment and sentence, Appellant raises

two issues. The first issue, which relates to an alleged error in the sentencing

process, is without merit, and we do not discuss it further. In the second issue, Appellant contends that the trial court committed a sentencing error by imposing

an illegal sentence that included a “no early termination” provision as a condition

of his probation. Under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(e), we are not

permitted to consider this claim because it was not preserved for appellate review

by a contemporaneous objection or motion to correct sentencing error pursuant to

rule 3.800(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. See Jackson v. State, 983 So.

2d 562, 568-69 (Fla. 2008).

Accordingly, we affirm Appellant's judgment and sentence. However, we do

so without prejudice to Appellant’s raising the unpreserved claim in a proper

motion for postconviction relief. See Hope v. State, 134 So. 3d 1044, 1046 (Fla.

1st DCA 2013).

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., BENTON and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. State
33 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 357 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2008)
Hope v. State
134 So. 3d 1044 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
COREY R. CAPEHART v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corey-r-capehart-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2014.