Corey O'Neal v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 30, 2026·No. 3D2026-0497·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed July 30, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D26-0497 Lower Tribunal No. F01-19774 ________________

Corey O'Neal, Appellant,

vs.

State of Florida, Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Cristina Miranda, Judge.

Corey O'Neal, in proper person.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Richard L. Polin, Chief Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Lewis v. State, 413 So. 3d 148, 150 (Fla. 4th DCA 2025)

(“[O]ur Supreme Court held that even though ‘the plain language of rule

3.800(a) does not expressly prohibit defendants from seeking to correct

unlawfully lenient sentences,’ Florida’s statutory law makes clear that

defendants ‘are not entitled to such relief absent a showing of prejudice.’”

(quoting Earl v. State, 314 So. 3d 1253, 1255 (Fla. 2021))); see also

§ 921.002(1)(g), Fla. Stat. (2001) (The Criminal Punishment Code: “The trial

court judge may impose a sentence up to and including the statutory

maximum for any offense, including an offense that is before the court due

to a violation of probation or community control.”) (emphasis added); State

v. Collins, 985 So. 2d 985, 991 (Fla. 2008) (“The legislature has amended

section 775.084 to specify that a habitual felony offender sentence is not

subject to the sentencing guidelines.” (citing § 775.084(4)(h), Fla. Stat.,

(2001) (providing that “[a] sentence imposed under [the habitual felony

offender statute] is not subject to s. 921.002.”))); id. § 775.084(4)(a)1.,

Fla. Stat. (“The court, in conformity with the procedure established in

paragraph (3)(a), may sentence the habitual felony offender as follows . . .

[i]n the case of a life felony or a felony of the first degree, for life.”) (emphasis

added); Cueto v. State, 979 So. 2d 1113, 1115 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (noting

this court can take judicial notice of records in a prior appeal); § 90.202(6),

2 Fla. Stat. (2025) (“A court may take judicial notice of . . . [r]ecords of any

court of this state or of any court of record of the United States or of any

state, territory, or jurisdiction of the United States.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Corey O'Neal v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Corey O'Neal v. State of Florida (Corey O'Neal v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Collins
985 So. 2d 985 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2008)
Cueto v. State
979 So. 2d 1113 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)