Corey Jujuan Williams v. Zetah Louis as Next Friend for "Khaseen" G. Israel Barney and Abcde "Jolie" Peterson, Minor Children

Opinion

Opinion issued April 19, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

permissive appeal from an interlocutory order that would not otherwise be

appealable, the requesting party must establish that (1) the order to be appealed

involves a “controlling question of law as to which there is a substantial ground for

difference of opinion” and (2) an immediate appeal from the order “may materially

advance the ultimate termination of the litigation.” TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE

§ 51.014(d); see TEX. R. APP. P. 28.3(e)(4); TEX. R. CIV. P. 168. Because we

conclude that the petition fails to establish each requirement of Rule 28.3(3)(e)(4),

we deny the petition for permissive appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 28.3(e)(4).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Countiss and Farris.

Footnotes

1. NO. 01-22-00236-CV ——————————— COREY JUJUAN WILLIAMS, Appellant V. ZETAH LOUIS, AS NEXT FRIEND OF KHASEEN ISRAEL-BARNEY AND ABCDE PETERSON. MINOR CHILDREN, Appellee On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 1 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 490,130 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Corey Jujuan Williams, has filed a petition for permissive appeal seeking to challenge an interlocutory order denying his motion for summary judgment on the constitutionality of Texas Estates Code § 201.062. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 51.014(d); TEX. R. APP. P. 28.3. To be entitled to a