Corey Fondren v. Michael White
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
No. 20-3217
Corey Fondren
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Michael White, Police Officer, Individual Capacity; Unknown Saul, Police Officer, Individual Capacity; Unknown Mason, Police Officer, Individual Capacity
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
Submitted: May 19, 2021
Filed: May 25, 2021
[Unpublished]
Before LOKEN, MELLOY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Corey Fondren appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having reviewed the record and the arguments on appeal, we conclude that Fondren has waived any challenge to the district court’s ruling because he does not meaningfully challenge the district court’s bases for granting the officers’ unopposed summary judgment motion. See Ahlberg v. Chrysler Corp., 481 F.3d 630, 638 (8th Cir. 2007). To the extent he intended to challenge the district court’s denial of his motion to be excused from his deposition after he voluntarily moved out of state during the proceedings, we discern no abuse of discretion. See Sheets v. Butera, 389 F.3d 772, 780 (8th Cir. 2004). We do not consider Fondren’s arguments regarding the timing of the summary judgment motion and Officer Michael White’s absence from Fondren’s deposition, because Fondren raised those arguments for the first time on appeal without having raised them in the district court during the proceedings. See Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914 (8th Cir. 2004). In any event, those arguments are contradicted by the record.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R.
47B.
1 The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Corey Fondren v. Michael White (Corey Fondren v. Michael White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.