Corey Fisherman v. Jared McGriff

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided December 28, 2020·No. 20-1671·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

No. 20-1671

Corey E. Fisherman

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Jared McGriff, also known as Jered McGreiff; Bradley Dupre, M.D.; Kristin Jacobs; Vicki Dean-Gramlich; Jack Serier

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

Kristin, RN Pro M-H

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota

Submitted: December 21, 2020 Filed: December 28, 2020

[Unpublished]

Before GRUENDER, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Corey Fisherman appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully reviewed the record, we find no basis for reversal. See Odom v. Kaizer, 864 F.3d 920, 921 (8th Cir. 2017) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo); Carter v. Arkansas, 392 F.3d 965, 968 (8th Cir. 2004) (dismissal for failure to state a claim is reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1 The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Elizabeth Cowan Wright, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Corey Fisherman v. Jared McGriff, (8th Cir. 2020).

Corey Fisherman v. Jared McGriff (Corey Fisherman v. Jared McGriff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carter v. Arkansas
392 F.3d 965 (Eighth Circuit, 2004)
Charles Odom v. Kenan Kaizer
864 F.3d 920 (Eighth Circuit, 2017)